Thanks for your message about the proposed phase-out of incandescent lightbulbs.The most common replacement for incandescent bulbs currently is the use of Compact Fluorescent Light bulbs (CFLs). I recognize this is not always the perfect replacement for the phasing out of incandescents though.I also want you to know that Paul Dewar’s Bill to phase out incandescent lightbulbs, as it is being drafted, does not specifically recommend the replacement of incandescents with CFLs. We recognize the new technology is being developed all the time, and hopefully we will soon have a solution that addresses all our concerns.The phasing out of incandescent light bulbs is one of many alternatives that can help place Canada on the path towards ensuring environmental security and sustainability.Thanks again for taking the time to write and share your concerns.Sincerely,Libby Davies
I did send a reply:
Dear Libby,Will keep all y'all posted...
With all due respect, the point I was making, and which bears repeating, is that banning incandescent bulbs does not generate a desired result.
If the desired result is to reduce the power consumption of light bulbs, then the answer is NOT "let's ban incandescents", but rather "light bulbs must not consume more than x watts per y lumens".
To once again use the example of California, they did not ban internal combustion engines, instead they set emission standards.
THAT is what I am advocating our government do.
So don't ban incandescent bulbs, set power consumption standards. THAT will achieve the stated goal.
Thank you.
No comments:
Post a Comment